Skip to Content
Pavan Geraedts
  • Practice
    • Working With Pavan Geraedts
    • Our Principles
    • About
    • FAQ
  • Services
    • Fiscal Advice
    • Juridical Advice
    • Digital, Data & IP
    • Company Structure & Governance
    • Transactions & Business Change
    • Business Mediation
  • Library
  • Academy
  • Contact
  • 0
  • 0
  • Nederlands English (US) Italiano
  • CLIENT AREA
Pavan Geraedts
  • 0
  • 0
    • Practice
      • Working With Pavan Geraedts
      • Our Principles
      • About
      • FAQ
    • Services
      • Fiscal Advice
      • Juridical Advice
      • Digital, Data & IP
      • Company Structure & Governance
      • Transactions & Business Change
      • Business Mediation
    • Library
    • Academy
    • Contact
  • Nederlands English (US) Italiano
  • CLIENT AREA
  • All Blogs
  • Governance
  • Director liable after false financing basis
  • Director liable after false financing basis

    April 10, 2026 by
    Paolo Maria Pavan


    What is the situation?

    On 27 January 2026, the Court of Appeal The Hague reopened and reversed part of its earlier judgment after finding procedural fraud under Article 382 Rv. The court held a director personally liable for €150,000 plus €31,155.06 in legal costs. The director had used a dormant BV to sign a property purchase agreement without proper financing.

    The BV had no funds. The director stopped the bank financing route. He instead relied on a risky resale to a third party, without secured pre-financing and without transparency to the seller. The court found he knew, or should have understood, that the BV could not perform and would offer no recovery if the deal failed.

    Analysis

    This is a sharp warning that limited liability does not protect directors who contract through shell companies while gambling on funding that is not actually secured.

    For micro and small businesses, the real signal is not real estate specific. It concerns decision integrity. If you sign through a BV that has no capital, no committed financing, and no realistic fallback, the court may move past the company and look directly at the director.

    A common challenge is that entrepreneurs sometimes regard anticipated future cash, positive expectations, or intended resale as actual financing. However, these are not substitutes for documented liquidity, aligned transaction structure, or transparent communication.

    Impact

    H1

    Do not sign major purchase agreements through a thinly capitalized BV unless financing is real, documented, and still available. Conditional expectations are not a funding strategy.

    H2

    Review all deals where performance depends on resale, investor money, or informal support. If the fallback fails, director liability may follow. This is especially true where counterparties were misled.

    H3

    This judgment strengthens a key Dutch rule: the BV shields normal business risk, not reckless contracting. Weak governance can turn a company's exposure into personal exposure.

    Daily operational takeaway

    Check every signed or pending contract where your company lacks cash coverage today. Verify funding, fallback, and what the counterparty was told.

    ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2026:331 The Hague Court of Appeal

    in Governance
    # COURT CASE COURT RULING GOVERNANCE Paolo Maria Pavan
    Paolo Maria Pavan April 10, 2026
    Share this post

    Share

    Tags
    COURT CASE COURT RULING GOVERNANCE Paolo Maria Pavan
    Our blogs
    • Market Pulse
    • Ledger & Tax
    • Human Resources
    • Compliance
    • Governance
    • Real Estate

    Read Next
    Smaller Mailbox Sector, Harder Questions for Dutch Company Directors
    The Dutch flow-through sector is smaller, but directors still need coherent evidence of ownership, control, service roles and payment routes.

    Upcoming Events

    Explore what’s happening next and join the moments that matter.

    See All
    Your Dynamic Snippet will be displayed here... This message is displayed because you did not provide enough options to retrieve its content.

    Pavan Geraedts Adviseurs

    Altroverso VOF trading as Pavan Geraedts Adviseurs. A boutique professional practice in Amersfoort for fiscal advice, juridical advice and business mediation.

    Chamber of Commerce: 56530021
    VAT: NL852171936B01
    BECON: 746393

    Complaints
    Email pg@altroverso.nl
    We acknowledge complaints as soon as possible and make reasonable efforts to find a satisfactory solution. Telephone and postal details are listed opposite.

    2012-2026 © Altroverso VOF
    All rights reserved.

    Practice

    About Pavan Geraedts
    Working With Pavan Geraedts
    Our Professional Principles
    Frequently Asked Questions
    Contact

    Areas of practice

    Fiscal Advice and Tax Matters
    Juridical Advice and Contracts
    Business Mediation
    Company Structure and Governance
    Digital, Data & IP
    Transactions & Business Change

    Knowledge and contact
    • Library
      Academy
      Client Area
    • Professional updates and invitations are shared with clients and contacts when they are relevant to the work of the practice.
    Pavan Geraedts
    • +31 (0)85 40 12 459

    • Rigaweg 9
    • 3825 PP Amersfoort
      The Netherlands
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Manifesto
    • Cookie Policy
    • Salary and Employment Policy

    Your privacy matters.

    May this website use cookies in this browser?

    Essential cookies support the operation of the website. With your permission, additional cookies may be used to improve your experience. Further information is available in our Cookie Policy and change your choice later.

    Allow all cookiesAllow essential cookies only