Skip to Content
Pavan Geraedts
  • Practice
    • Working With Pavan Geraedts
    • Our Principles
    • About
    • FAQ
  • Services
    • Fiscal Advice
    • Juridical Advice
    • Digital, Data & IP
    • Company Structure & Governance
    • Transactions & Business Change
    • Business Mediation
  • Library
  • Academy
  • Contact
  • 0
  • 0
  • Nederlands English (US) Italiano
  • CLIENT AREA
Pavan Geraedts
  • 0
  • 0
    • Practice
      • Working With Pavan Geraedts
      • Our Principles
      • About
      • FAQ
    • Services
      • Fiscal Advice
      • Juridical Advice
      • Digital, Data & IP
      • Company Structure & Governance
      • Transactions & Business Change
      • Business Mediation
    • Library
    • Academy
    • Contact
  • Nederlands English (US) Italiano
  • CLIENT AREA
  • All Blogs
  • Governance
  • Locked box means locked, even after closing
  • Locked box means locked, even after closing

    April 17, 2026 by
    Paolo Maria Pavan


    What is the situation?

    On 11 February 2026, the Amsterdam District Court ordered seller Concha Beheer B.V. to repay €175,000 to buyer Select Nederland B.V., plus interest, €2,525 in collection costs, and €11,274.25 in legal costs.

    The dispute arose from a share sale involving a locked-box mechanism. That mechanism fixes the company’s economic value at an agreed date and blocks value leakage to the seller between that date and closing. Here, the effective date was 1 January 2024, but a €175,000 dividend had been paid to the seller on 8 January 2024. 

    The court held that this was an unauthorized extraction and that the parties had to be reimbursed euro for euro.

    Analysis

    This judgment shows that, in SME acquisitions, drafting discipline outweighs post-deal explanations. The seller argued the dividend was known, reflected in pricing, or harmless, but the court rejected all three.

    The primary practical takeaway is that, where an SPA contains explicit restrictions on post-locked box withdrawals, courts may interpret and enforce those clauses strictly, particularly in instances where both parties engaged professional advisers and employed consistent balance-sheet logic from LOI through to SPA execution.

    The blind spot for small businesses continues informal deal behavior. Many founder-led transactions still rely on assumptions, side conversations, or partial disclosures in emails. That becomes dangerous when the contract later speaks more clearly than the negotiation did.

    Impact

    H1

    If you are buying or selling shares, review any dividend, management fee, loan repayment, or related-party payment made between the valuation date and the closing. “Everyone knew” is not a safe control.

    H2

    Due diligence processes should be aligned with contractual documentation. Where a locked box clause is included in the SPA, all documentation, including data room records, board resolutions, and management confirmations, should be thorough and internally consistent.

    H3

    For micro and small companies, transaction risk often lies in governance hygiene rather than valuation. Weak documentation can turn a routine founder exit into a cash repayment dispute after closing.

    Daily operational takeaway

    Prior to executing any share transaction, undertake a comprehensive review of the preceding 12 months of shareholder and related-party transactions. Confirm alignment with the LOI, SPA, and all relevant board resolutions before signature.

    ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2026:2242 Rechtbank Amsterdam

    in Governance
    # COURT CASE COURT RULING GOVERNANCE Paolo Maria Pavan
    Paolo Maria Pavan April 17, 2026
    Share this post

    Share

    Tags
    COURT CASE COURT RULING GOVERNANCE Paolo Maria Pavan
    Our blogs
    • Market Pulse
    • Ledger & Tax
    • Human Resources
    • Compliance
    • Governance
    • Real Estate

    Read Next
    Forced shareholder exit over financing risk

    Upcoming Events

    Explore what’s happening next and join the moments that matter.

    See All
    Your Dynamic Snippet will be displayed here... This message is displayed because you did not provide enough options to retrieve its content.

    Pavan Geraedts Adviseurs

    Altroverso VOF trading as Pavan Geraedts Adviseurs. A boutique professional practice in Amersfoort for fiscal advice, juridical advice and business mediation.

    Chamber of Commerce: 56530021
    VAT: NL852171936B01
    BECON: 746393

    Complaints
    Email pg@altroverso.nl
    We acknowledge complaints as soon as possible and make reasonable efforts to find a satisfactory solution. Telephone and postal details are listed opposite.

    2012-2026 © Altroverso VOF
    All rights reserved.

    Practice

    About Pavan Geraedts
    Working With Pavan Geraedts
    Our Professional Principles
    Frequently Asked Questions
    Contact

    Areas of practice

    Fiscal Advice and Tax Matters
    Juridical Advice and Contracts
    Business Mediation
    Company Structure and Governance
    Digital, Data & IP
    Transactions & Business Change

    Knowledge and contact
    • Library
      Academy
      Client Area
    • Professional updates and invitations are shared with clients and contacts when they are relevant to the work of the practice.
    Pavan Geraedts
    • +31 (0)85 40 12 459

    • Rigaweg 9
    • 3825 PP Amersfoort
      The Netherlands
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Manifesto
    • Cookie Policy
    • Salary and Employment Policy

    Your privacy matters.

    May this website use cookies in this browser?

    Essential cookies support the operation of the website. With your permission, additional cookies may be used to improve your experience. Further information is available in our Cookie Policy and change your choice later.

    Allow all cookiesAllow essential cookies only