Skip to Content
Pavan Geraedts
  • Practice
    • Working With Pavan Geraedts
    • Our Principles
    • About
    • FAQ
  • Services
    • Fiscal Advice
    • Juridical Advice
    • Digital, Data & IP
    • Company Structure & Governance
    • Transactions & Business Change
    • Business Mediation
  • Library
  • Academy
  • Contact
  • 0
  • 0
  • Nederlands English (US) Italiano
  • CLIENT AREA
Pavan Geraedts
  • 0
  • 0
    • Practice
      • Working With Pavan Geraedts
      • Our Principles
      • About
      • FAQ
    • Services
      • Fiscal Advice
      • Juridical Advice
      • Digital, Data & IP
      • Company Structure & Governance
      • Transactions & Business Change
      • Business Mediation
    • Library
    • Academy
    • Contact
  • Nederlands English (US) Italiano
  • CLIENT AREA
  • All Blogs
  • Governance
  • Director dismissal stands after procedure challenge
  • Director dismissal stands after procedure challenge

    April 19, 2026 by
    Paolo Maria Pavan



    What is the situation?

    The Haarlem court upheld the removal of a director on 11 February 2026. The dismissed director lost on all key points. ("Dismissal" here means formal termination of the directorship role.)

    The court found the dismissal procedure valid: the meeting notice was sufficient, the agenda was clear, the director had the opportunity to give his advisory view, and the company respected its duty to hear him beforehand.

    A separate salary claim also failed. The court held that his employment contract remained with the subsidiary (the company controlled by another, larger company), not with the holding company (the parent company) that terminated him as director.

    The claim to cancel the dismissal was rejected. The claimant was ordered to pay €2,209 in legal costs (court-related expenses).

    Analysis

    This is important for small businesses because Dutch board disputes frequently focus on process rather than underlying issues. The court shows that following clear steps can protect any company, especially when relationships fracture.

    For micro and small businesses, the real signal is this: if you dismiss a director, the quality of the process matters as much as the reason itself. Agenda wording, prior notice, hearing opportunity, and documented minutes can decide the case.

    There is also a practical distortion here. A person may be both an employee and a director, but those roles do not automatically sit within the same legal entity. If the structure is split across group companies, payment claims and dismissal consequences may be split too.

    Impact

    H1

    Before dismissing a director, thoroughly review the dismissal file: notice, agenda, hearing record, advisory vote, and minutes.

    H2

    Where directors also have employment roles, map exactly which entity employs them and which entity appoints them as directors. Many small groups are weaker here than they think.

    H3

    This ruling reinforces a broader governance lesson: informal founder habits become legal risks once trust breaks down. Small companies need board procedures before they need a dispute.

    Daily operational takeaway

    Audit your current director's appointment, employment, and dismissal documents this week. In small companies, legal weaknesses often arise from overlaps among roles, entities, and undocumented processes.

    ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2026:1375 Rechtbank Noord-Holland

    in Governance
    # COURT CASE COURT RULING GOVERNANCE Paolo Maria Pavan
    Paolo Maria Pavan April 19, 2026
    Share this post

    Share

    Tags
    COURT CASE COURT RULING GOVERNANCE Paolo Maria Pavan
    Our blogs
    • Market Pulse
    • Ledger & Tax
    • Human Resources
    • Compliance
    • Governance
    • Real Estate

    Read Next
    Locked box means locked, even after closing

    Upcoming Events

    Explore what’s happening next and join the moments that matter.

    See All
    Your Dynamic Snippet will be displayed here... This message is displayed because you did not provide enough options to retrieve its content.

    Pavan Geraedts Adviseurs

    Altroverso VOF trading as Pavan Geraedts Adviseurs. A boutique professional practice in Amersfoort for fiscal advice, juridical advice and business mediation.

    Chamber of Commerce: 56530021
    VAT: NL852171936B01
    BECON: 746393

    Complaints
    Email pg@altroverso.nl
    We acknowledge complaints as soon as possible and make reasonable efforts to find a satisfactory solution. Telephone and postal details are listed opposite.

    2012-2026 © Altroverso VOF
    All rights reserved.

    Practice

    About Pavan Geraedts
    Working With Pavan Geraedts
    Our Professional Principles
    Frequently Asked Questions
    Contact

    Areas of practice

    Fiscal Advice and Tax Matters
    Juridical Advice and Contracts
    Business Mediation
    Company Structure and Governance
    Digital, Data & IP
    Transactions & Business Change

    Knowledge and contact
    • Library
      Academy
      Client Area
    • Professional updates and invitations are shared with clients and contacts when they are relevant to the work of the practice.
    Pavan Geraedts
    • +31 (0)85 40 12 459

    • Rigaweg 9
    • 3825 PP Amersfoort
      The Netherlands
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Manifesto
    • Cookie Policy
    • Salary and Employment Policy

    Your privacy matters.

    May this website use cookies in this browser?

    Essential cookies support the operation of the website. With your permission, additional cookies may be used to improve your experience. Further information is available in our Cookie Policy and change your choice later.

    Allow all cookiesAllow essential cookies only